Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MplsSteve

Shale oil uneconomical at prices below $30bbl. However, we have been considerably above $30bbl for sometime now. My husband has been saying this for weeks -- that we should be moving ahead with shale oil recovery. However, that still leaves the problem of refineries -- where do you send it?

The second part of his thesis is to build refineries on decommissioned military bases -- spread overa many sections of the country so that they are not such a big target for natural, or manmade, disaster. The Federal government has control over military land, and I think they would not need permits -- California and Florida enviro-weenies be damned!

My contribution to this thesis (and I thought of this days before Michael Savage mentioned it on air) is to re-open housing for refugees on those same decommissioned bases and employ the displaced workers to build the refineries! (Walk to work.) The women can be employed in clerical, or service jobs associated with constructing the refineries, or educating the children who live there. Outside teachers could be brought in if needed. Three problems solved at one shot and at minimal cost to the taxpayer.

This would be similar to WPA and CCC projects during the Depression. Win, win, win. We reduce our dependence on foreign oil, we rehabilitate displaced workers, we house and rebuild displaced families.


13 posted on 09/03/2005 2:20:08 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: afraidfortherepublic

what you're implying is that the evacuees coming out of new orleans learn to fend for themselves? who knows, it might work but you're still going to have a percentage of them (no idea what that percentage would be) that will still want Uncle Sam to take care of them..but, excellent idea..:)


20 posted on 09/03/2005 2:25:11 PM PDT by GeorgiaDawg32 (If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my children may live in peace..Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

That is a pretty damned good idea.


39 posted on 09/03/2005 2:43:06 PM PDT by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

"However, that still leaves the problem of refineries -- where do you send it? "

The good part about this process is that the oil is collected almost refined as is. The benzenes and smaller alkanes are the first to get collected. Those are the gasolines and jet fuels. Followed by heavier stuff, which may be able to run the heaters.


42 posted on 09/03/2005 2:47:25 PM PDT by Flightdeck (Like the turtle, science makes progress only with its neck out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

The problem is that it cost the Saudis $4 a barrel to get oil out of their deserts. The have a HUGE built in price advantage that shale will never overcome.


73 posted on 09/03/2005 4:47:04 PM PDT by ElTianti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Seems to me as the oil bubbles up it is already heated and the refining process could commence right on site.


104 posted on 09/04/2005 3:13:53 AM PDT by stocksthatgoup (Polls = Proof that when the MSM want your opinion they will give it to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson