Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: areafiftyone
Not to quibble too much...I'm extremely glad for the ammunition to defend Bush...but "appeal" is a bit different from "order" as is in your title.
15 posted on 09/03/2005 7:28:16 AM PDT by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Siena Dreaming

***Not to quibble too much...I'm extremely glad for the ammunition to defend Bush...but "appeal" is a bit different from "order" as is in your title.***

The President cannot, by law, ORDER a governor to evacuate a state, nor can he send in federal troops without the governor's permission. States rights must be upheld in order to prevent some future president from becoming a dictator. Think of Gore or Kerry as president, and you'll see how the law protects this country from being taken over by subversives.

If anyone has the exact wording of the law on this matter, it would be appreciated so that we can counteract the libs' claims.


94 posted on 09/03/2005 9:02:25 AM PDT by kitkat ("We're not going to let anybody frighten us from our great love of freedom." GWB, 7/22/05))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Siena Dreaming

But Bush could not order the governor..it was HER call. Truth be known, Bush saved a lot of lives down there. Now if he had the abosolute power the libs THINK (but do not want) he has...those buses would not be sitting inwater right now...But had he gone in against the governors wishes, he would be called a tyrant..control freak...dangerous...hitler...fill in the blank...


284 posted on 09/10/2005 10:52:15 PM PDT by nellutgen (nell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson