Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mad Dawgg

The Chicago fire and Hiroshima were not natural disasters that happen on a regular basis. San Francisco, on the other hand...well that's got a lot of potential to be. I keep hearing warnings about how the big one is coming, just like here. I'm not opposed to rebuilding; I just don't want to see history repeat itself and this one seems to be more likely than the others.


1,457 posted on 09/01/2005 7:44:27 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1357 | View Replies ]


To: metmom
It's not just the Big One we have to worry about out here. There are lots of other, smaller, earthquake faults which are bloody dangerous. The most dangerous of the lesser ones we know about is the Hayward Fault on the East Bay side of San Francisco Bay - it runs right through UC Berkeley's sports stadium, and is potent enough to take out San Francisco on the west side as well as the East Bay (which it did 150 years ago).

And about half of California's water supply depends on a levee system far more fragile than that of New Orleans - in the Sacramento Delta. It could be taken out by a moderate earthquake or a real good storm, and we had one of those 50 years ago which almost brought down the Golden Gate Bridge - my father drove the next to last car across it to the north before the Bridge was closed from swaying too dangerously.

1,764 posted on 09/01/2005 8:27:06 PM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1457 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson