Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur

I have no problem with private citizens rebuilding there, putting their own money and the money of anyone willing to insure them at risk. I would rather the government not do it with my money.


31 posted on 09/01/2005 2:30:40 PM PDT by RobRoy (Child support and maintenance (alimony) are what we used to call indentured slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: RobRoy
I have no problem with private citizens rebuilding there, putting their own money and the money of anyone willing to insure them at risk. I would rather the government not do it with my money.

Ding Ding Ding! We have a winner! This is so true. I have NEVER understood rebuilding within flood prone areas. This is why flood insurance is required when you build a home in a flood zone. This is why insurance is so much more expensive when people build in areas with a higher chances of said disasters.

Tax dollars should never be used to rebuild - particularly putting said structures right back in forseeable danger.

163 posted on 09/01/2005 3:06:32 PM PDT by TheBattman (Islam (and liberalism)- the cult of Satan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson