Don't be silly. Then what is the purpose of allowing ANY discussion of the article that was posted?
The article, unlike a lot of MSM stories seems to cover the issue fairly well, Pacific Justice is involved, and they don't jump in rashly.
What makes you think there is more to the story?
we've not heard anything from the company involved, we don't know what the bumper sticker actually said, that kind of stuff.
clearly there are some details missing.
commenting on the story is fine, it's what we do around here. my comments revolve around the notion that you have taken as gospel what this very short story reveals.
How about "What did the bumper sticker actually say?"