To: konaice
You obviously don't have a clue, no science background.
To say that there is a less than 50% chance these are true tells you that there is something going on.
Why would postulate a theory that can't be supported by numbers and facts?
If there was a greater than 75% (considered the lowest acceptable confidence level) that these are true, I would be happy. less than 50% is a joke.
32 posted on
08/31/2005 7:24:08 PM PDT by
dila813
To: dila813
You obviously don't have a clue, no science background. I suggest you learn how to follow a thread before you start flaming someone for SOMETHING THEY WERE QUOTING.
35 posted on
08/31/2005 10:02:54 PM PDT by
konaice
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson