Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: konaice
You obviously don't have a clue, no science background.

To say that there is a less than 50% chance these are true tells you that there is something going on.

Why would postulate a theory that can't be supported by numbers and facts?

If there was a greater than 75% (considered the lowest acceptable confidence level) that these are true, I would be happy. less than 50% is a joke.
32 posted on 08/31/2005 7:24:08 PM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: dila813
You obviously don't have a clue, no science background.

I suggest you learn how to follow a thread before you start flaming someone for SOMETHING THEY WERE QUOTING.

35 posted on 08/31/2005 10:02:54 PM PDT by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson