Wow, are you ever confused! I know that a profile doesn't equate two things. But Jim_Curtis was equating two things. Therefore, he wasn't "profiling" at all, though you mistakenly claimed he was. What he was doing was saying that a bunch of people are illegal aliens, when in fact he doesn't know. Perhaps this time you get it?
Another complete distortion. I believe in enforcing the law.
So you're trying, yet again, to claim that you approve of labor protectionism raising wages, even though you don't approve of the resulting higher costs. OK, so you're still confused. Keep trying and you might get it.
Got it, scofflaw?
Identify the law I've broken, troll.
Are you ever deceitful. That's why I don't believe one damn thing you say about Jim_Curtis either "equating" or "profiling" anything.
So you're trying, yet again, to claim that you approve of labor protectionism raising wages, even though you don't approve of the resulting higher costs. OK, so you're still confused. Keep trying and you might get it.
Get this, scofflaw: I believe the law should be enforced until it is changed. I don't make the law, but I have to obey it anyway, whatever it costs me. If you don't believe the law is to be obeyed, then no matter how you slice your baloney, you're a scofflaw.
Identify the law I've broken, troll.
Heh, heh, it's not that I think you've broken a law, sweetheart---it's just that you advocate "lower costs" for the "wrong reasons." BWAHAHAHAHAHA!