FWIW I still use CB (it's better now that most of the nutz are gone. Kinda like the way it was before they came.) and my family uses FRS for low level comm, although it isn't as good as some claim.
The Wife and Kidz are also familiar with shortwave. Although we aren't hams we still use an old RS DX150 receiver and sometimes check in with the local hamfests.
prisoner6
well, it takes a while to replace trunked radio systems....I think everything west of Kenner on the La. State system is gone.
Putting up temp cell towers is a lot quicker....that is what I heard on the SATERN net this afternoon...(Salvation Army)
There is also supposed to be 270 hams on the air soon.....mostly shadowing the Red Cross shelters/locations (240 of them) so you are going to have more information flow....
There was ONE ham in New Orleans today on the air....on battery power....
When the cell towers loses commercial power.. it has at the most a handful of hours of battery back up. Then you have to haul a generator out to the site. With a big fuel bladder.
"I don't quite understand the cell phone thing. It's probably good to get it up and running, especially to keep communications with rescue crews. BUT I would think rescue crews would be better off with radio comms."
Problem with radio comms would be frequencies. Not all radios would have compatible freqs. Cells would permit emergency personnel to speak with whomever they had numbers for; i.e, much more flexibility. Assumption is they can also recharge them. Possible with generator power.