Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bushbacker1
IMHO, that is why Burglar stole the documents. They were what remained of those that had not been destroyed. Clinton might have given the order initially and subsequent to the 9-11 hearings!

Yes. At this point it seems likely that Burglar was told to go to the archives and destroy evidence. I am getting more and more convinced that that evidence (at least some of it) was related to 'Able Danger'.

By the way, I also find it very interesting that just as this 'Able Danger' stuff was entering the radar screen, the judge in the Sandypants Burglar case decided to postpone sentencing. I simply do not believe in coincidence when it comes to Washington politics.

Regards,
LH

590 posted on 08/29/2005 10:36:30 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]


To: Lancey Howard

Well put.

BTW, I've been trying to find out when the OTHER special prosecutor from the Clinton years (re: Cisneros) is releasing his report. Rumor had it that there was a bunch of stuff in the report about the Clinton Admin abusing the IRS. Seemed like it was to be released in July but I haven't been able to locate it. It is the report that the Dems tried to kill in the Senate saying that the S.P. had already wasted $96 million dollars. I think it was Tony Snow who broadcasted the efforts of the Dems to squelch the report.


614 posted on 08/29/2005 11:23:54 PM PDT by Kay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 590 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson