I am not a "Buchananite", and fyi, name me ONE politician who is not a "media whore". They are synonymous.
I do however, find Pat Buchanan to be much more credible than George Bush. I guess that means Pat ain't as good a whore as George.
"I am not a "Buchananite", and fyi, name me ONE politician who is not a "media whore". They are synonymous.
I do however, find Pat Buchanan to be much more credible than George Bush. I guess that means Pat ain't as good a whore as George."
I notice that a number of posters are baffled by the concept of agreeing with someone on some issues, and disagreeing with them on others. They seem to be sycophants for the most part who idolize President Bush, so I suppose they cannot help but view others through the same prism.
I recall a poster on another thread who was irate with other posters who opposed CAFTA. His response was to post a picture of Hugo Chavez hugging Fidel Castro, and claimed that since Chavez opposed CAFTA anyone else who opposed it was a fan of Hugo Chavez! Later in the same thread he supported nuclear power (I do too), it would have been amusing had someone posted a picture of Lyndon LaRouche and applied his own logic against him!