Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kevin OMalley
Kevin OMalley posted the following: "When renowned scientists such as Stephen Hawking start acknowledging that the odds against abiogenesis are astronomical, it makes your average conservative look askance at the money being spent on SETI. "

I am still puzzled why, for example, an "average conservative" would decide that Hawking's estimate of the the odds against abiogenesis translate into lessened expectations for SETI. If an intelligent designer created all life on earth, how does this create a low probability for that same inteligent designer having created life on some other planet?

80 posted on 08/30/2005 8:47:39 PM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: William Tell

That's a pretty good point. For the SETI stuff, their search for life can be justified with an ID hand-waving on top of any abiogenesis probabilities. They're in a catbird seat.

The SETI project was criticized from an abio point of view, and the scientist who did it used some probability calculations which appear to have been peer reviewed. I am looking for any peer-reviewed update of those probability calculations. That would be my starting point for acceptable material to use for purposes of public policy discussions.


81 posted on 08/31/2005 11:16:56 AM PDT by Kevin OMalley (No, not Freeper#95235, Freeper #1165: Charter member, What Was My Login Club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson