[Dark Knight]

Here's the rub. NS as the mechanism for Evolution is the theory. Duh. You want to elevate the theory to a process that is unquestioned. It makes NS truer in your mind.

You are the reason for IDer's being around.

You expound some pretty strange stuff. Like claims of unquestionable truth that are more related to tautology than expansion of knowledge.

Study some epistemology.

Let the self serving bovine excremental replies begin.

DK

[Dimensio]

NS as the mechanism for Evolution is the theory.

NS is a definition of a process. It's something that happens. It's something that we can observe happening. It's not a theory. It is not an underlying general explanation for a phenomenon.

You're trying to play a semantic game. You're not fooling anyone but yourself.

You want to elevate the theory to a process that is unquestioned.

Are you suggesting that NS may not occur? Then what are the observations that have been labelled natural selection?