[Clump]

I believe my knowledge of the truth of Christianity is a piece of evidence that the theory of evolution is false. Whether you or anyone else agrees with me is IRRELEVANT.

Macro evolution is a religious belief as far as I am concerned. It is indeed more difficult to believe than intelligent design.

Thanks for trying to dictate the bounds of relevant and appropriate discussion though. Funny how Christians are called the intolerant ones.

[newcats]

I believe my knowledge of the truth of Christianity is a piece of evidence that the theory of evolution is false.
So...if you believe something, that automaticly makes it a fact?

Macro evolution is a religious belief as far as I am concerned.
Please give me YOUR definition of what a "religon" is.

It is indeed more difficult to believe than intelligent design.
I agree it is much easier to just sit back and not have to think or use your brain.

[Dimensio]

I believe my knowledge of the truth of Christianity is a piece of evidence that the theory of evolution is false. Whether you or anyone else agrees with me is IRRELEVANT.

Assertions of truth are not themselves evidence. Your claim that Christianity is true is no more evidence for it (and against evolution) than someone's claim that evolution is true is evidence that it is true.

Macro evolution is a religious belief as far as I am concerned.

Redefining terms to suit your whims does not make for honest discussion.

It is indeed more difficult to believe than intelligent design.

Argument from personal incredulity is not a logical argument.

Thanks for trying to dictate the bounds of relevant and appropriate discussion though.

Yes, how dare I suggest that people not redefine terms to suit their whims and arrogantly insist upon a false dichotomy between "a specific interpretation of Christianity" and "atheism". Arguments for ID are so much easier when you're not constrained by the rules of logic.