[Junior]

First, eliminate the impossible, life coming from non-life. Then once you have eliminated what is impossible, what you are left with must be true, no matter how improbable. (Sherlock Holmes)

Actually, the Bible is not the default position or null hypothesis here. There needs to be POSITIVE evidence for your position.

[fortheDeclaration]

First, eliminate the impossible, life coming from non-life. Then once you have eliminated what is impossible, what you are left with must be true, no matter how improbable. (Sherlock Holmes) Actually, the Bible is not the default position or null hypothesis here. There needs to be POSITIVE evidence for your position.

The positive evidence for my position are the laws of Thermodynamics and biogenesis.

In the end, since we are dealing with an untestable Beginning both paradigms must be accepted by faith.

Christians acknowledge that (Heb.11:3).

Evolutionists want to pretend that they are 'scientific'when in fact, they just evade dealing with the ultimate reality of what their system is really teaching, life came from non-life.

Take your pick on what is more believable.