Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gvl_M3; pigdog; RobFromGa; groanup
One more thing.

A more controllable way to decipher these accumulated tax costs is to reverse the model offered by pigdog (as my original treatment of this topic did.) By starting with consumer price and recursively extracting tax costs from any number of levels of production upstream, the model quickly approaches a finite limit of the true embedded tax (ie, the model converges) rather than exploding ad-infinitum depending on the inputs and number of levels you choose (ie, the model diverges.)

This top down approach will never give such untennable answers as "the tax accumulated after the nth level of production exceeds the total of all Federal tax receipts..." as pigdog's method can. And it doesn't require you to know the number of level of production ... by choosing a suitably large number, the top down model converges.

366 posted on 08/26/2005 2:33:31 AM PDT by Dimples
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies ]


To: Dimples
A more controllable way to decipher these accumulated tax costs is to reverse the model offered by pigdog (as my original treatment of this topic did.)
I notice you use the term "accumulated tax costs." Pigdog claims these are "cascading" taxes. What's your opinion on that?
379 posted on 08/26/2005 7:03:00 AM PDT by Your Nightmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies ]

To: Dimples

It is not "pigdog's method" in #311 as I explained, but perhaps you can show us how many levels it takes to exceed "all Federal tax income" by exploding ad-infinitum using the parameters and methodology given??


457 posted on 08/28/2005 2:52:21 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson