Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Always Right
Yes, but Jorgenson clarified this comment and made it crystal clear that Jorgenson was figuring that employee take home pay would remain constant.....meaning employees have to take a pay cut. I know you are one who will remain in denial. But that is not my problem.

And that has ABSOLUTELY nothing to do with and is TOTALLY unresponsive to the question that I asked!

193 posted on 08/25/2005 8:14:05 AM PDT by Bigun (IRS sucks @getridof it.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]


To: Bigun
And that has ABSOLUTELY nothing to do with and is TOTALLY unresponsive to the question that I asked!

You mean this question: "Why do you persist in trying to make the spurious argument that the only costs imposed by the income tax system are the taxes themselves when you KNOW that to be untrue?

Because there was nothing false about my arguement. You are just trying to change the subject. We have debated compliance costs before and I have always acknowleged some, but that has nothing to do with the point at hand.

197 posted on 08/25/2005 8:22:20 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson