Skip to comments.
Scientists Mess with the Speed of Light (breaking the speed limit, sort of)
pure energy systems ^
| 19 aug 05
| Ker Than
Posted on 08/24/2005 6:02:52 PM PDT by Arkie2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
To: FreedomCalls
The phase velocity is not the velocity of light. It's sort of like when you see those old movies of an automobile rolling down the street and it looks like the wheels are moving backwards. They aren't really of course.
To: Arkie2
Although information can be channeled through fiber optics at the speed of light, it cant be processed at this speed because with current technologies, light signals must be transformed into much slower electrical signals before they are useful. Much slower electrical signals? Hardly. The problem with electrical signals is not their speed, but the capacitance slowing down clear transitions, and the resistance at high frequency.
22
posted on
08/24/2005 6:31:46 PM PDT
by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: PatrickHenry
This certainly doesn't amount to much of it's own accord, but I find it quite intriguing how researchers have been nudging at the edges of the theory of relativity. What it all means ultimately, I wouldn't dare venture to guess (oh, alright, I'm unconvinced that the speed of light is an unbreakable barrier - I am convinced that it certainly appears to be so in our current understanding - my contraryness is probably just wishful thinking). As for a ping list, I think it's great that you keep it from spinning out of control; your judgment is good enough for me!
23
posted on
08/24/2005 6:31:55 PM PDT
by
AntiGuv
("Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." Philip K. Dick)
To: Arkie2
a popular misconception is that, according to Einsteins special theory of relativity, nothing in the universe can travel faster than this speed. Somebody 'splain to me where this 'misconception' is, because I was pretty sure that one of Einstein's laws is exactly that.
24
posted on
08/24/2005 6:33:59 PM PDT
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: Prime Choice
186,000 miles per second.
It's not just a good idea. It's the law. Actually, you can go up to 186,282 MPH without getting a ticket.
25
posted on
08/24/2005 6:35:00 PM PDT
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: Izzy Dunne
Actually, you can go up to 186,282 MPH without getting a ticket. Only because the radar guns max out at 185,500. Nyack!
26
posted on
08/24/2005 6:36:37 PM PDT
by
Prime Choice
(E=mc^3. Don't drink and derive.)
To: I see my hands
That's alright; some of us won't read it until yesterday.
27
posted on
08/24/2005 6:39:36 PM PDT
by
Reaganghost
(Our freedoms will never be safe as long as a single Democrat holds elected public office.)
To: AntiGuv
As for a ping list, I think it's great that you keep it from spinning out of control; your judgment is good enough for me! I probably take my ping list "responsibilities" too seriously. But I'd rather not have people dropping out because they get bothered by too many pings to trivial stuff. No one ever drops out because of too few pings.
28
posted on
08/24/2005 6:40:03 PM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. The List-O-Links is at my homepage.)
To: Izzy Dunne; Arkie2
Somebody 'splain to me where this 'misconception' is [according to Einsteins special theory of relativity, nothing in the universe can travel faster than this speed], because I was pretty sure that one of Einstein's laws is exactly that.I'm not sure what Arkie2 had in mind, but the inflationary big bang model has the universe briefly expanding FTL. I've seen various explanations as to why this doesn't create a problem, but it's probably because it doesn't involve any possible causality contradictions. Undoubtedly, an expert will pop in to show where I've botched this up. If so, I welcome the information.
29
posted on
08/24/2005 6:45:41 PM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. The List-O-Links is at my homepage.)
To: PatrickHenry
Exactly. I've dropped ping lists before because the flood of pings is just too overwhelming.
30
posted on
08/24/2005 6:50:26 PM PDT
by
AntiGuv
("Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." Philip K. Dick)
To: Izzy Dunne
Actually, you can go up to 186,282 MPH without getting a ticket.That would be MPS. (And you wanted to be MY latex physicist...)
To: PatrickHenry
I probably take my ping list "responsibilities" too seriously . . .You have a ping list?
To: leftcoaster
Uhh, well my statement is still true ;->
Of course you could also go faster, as in 186282 MPS.
33
posted on
08/24/2005 7:04:28 PM PDT
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: PatrickHenry
If you'll look at the title of the article the note in parenthesis is mine. I'm aware nothing mentioned here violates Einstein's theories but it's intweresting from a technical viewpoint.
Actually, the most amusing aspect of this article is the note that scientists have slowed light to zero. If only it were true we would never have to worry about Hillary being elected prez!
34
posted on
08/24/2005 7:07:21 PM PDT
by
Arkie2
(No, we cannot make cheese as stinky as the French.)
To: Prime Choice
It's not just a good idea. It's the law. That's what the said about the sound barrier.
35
posted on
08/24/2005 7:16:52 PM PDT
by
NY.SS-Bar9
(DR #1692 NIT 475-5X :()
To: IronJack
The velocity they are talking about isn't anything real. It's the speed at which the interference patterns between the different light frequencies pass.
Think of it this way: Say you have two fans spinning at different speeds and you put one in front of the other in front of a light source. As the fans spin, you'll see a shifting pattern of light and dark as the fan blades interfere with each other in transmitting the background light. The speed at which these patterns change can be much faster than the spinning speed of the fans, but it's not a real velocity.
Likewise, when you put multiple frequencies of light together, you get a similar effect. Bands of interference will move in the same direction as the light, but can move much faster than the light itself.
Unfortunately, the moment you try to analyze the information carried by the interference patterns, you are once again restricted to the speed of light because you have to wait for a certain number of patterns to pass by, and amazingly, that number is just enough to slow the whole thing back down to the speed of light again.
36
posted on
08/24/2005 7:22:59 PM PDT
by
frgoff
To: Izzy Dunne
The misconception is not being able to travel faster than light.
Actually, the relativity equations say no such thing. What they say is that you can't travel AT the speed of light, unless you are massless.
Once you get past the speed of light, the equations work again, except that a number of them have an imaginary component (sqrt-1).
A superluminary universe has some interesting properties according to relativity theory. Rest mass is at 2sqrt(2)c, doppler shifts are reversed, it takes infinite energy to slow DOWN to the speed of light, etc.
37
posted on
08/24/2005 7:27:07 PM PDT
by
frgoff
To: NY.SS-Bar9
That's what the said about the sound barrier. The sound barrier didn't require near-zero mass to break.
38
posted on
08/24/2005 7:35:35 PM PDT
by
Prime Choice
(E=mc^3. Don't drink and derive.)
To: Izzy Dunne
"Actually, you can go up to 186,282 MPH without getting a ticket."
But it is one massive ticket.
39
posted on
08/24/2005 7:38:15 PM PDT
by
BootsOnTheGround
(A free America is the World's only hope.)
To: frgoff
A superluminary universe has some interesting properties according to relativity theory. Rest mass is at 2sqrt(2)c, doppler shifts are reversed, it takes infinite energy to slow DOWN to the speed of light, etc. Yeah, that makes sense. It's like approaching a limit from the "other side."
40
posted on
08/24/2005 7:38:57 PM PDT
by
IronJack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson