Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07
Actually, thats not the constitutional issue.

Agreed. And I agree on your conclusion with respect to the establishment clause.

But I wasn't addressing the Constitutional issues, only the practical issue of why anyone even cares about swearing to tell the truth in the first place. My point is that you don't even need to consider the Constitutional issues to realize that having any and all witnesses swear on a Bible is simply ridiculous. The issue can and should be decided on that point alone.

34 posted on 08/24/2005 4:34:10 PM PDT by sourcery ("Compelling State Interest" is the refuge of judicial activist traitors against the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: sourcery

That's up to the legislature, I thought we were talking courts. My mistake.


36 posted on 08/24/2005 4:36:59 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (Atheism is not conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson