Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JmyBryan
It's highly unlikely the boy died from EDTA if they were watching his creatinine.

The problem is that we don't even know if it was a medical professional doing the chelation. And even if it was, they obviously are taking chances by performing this, since it is an unproven therapy for an unproven cause to autism (mercury).

25 posted on 08/24/2005 3:40:51 PM PDT by Born Conservative ("If not us, who? And if not now, when? - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Born Conservative

I agree they were taking foolish chances if not using medical people. But the treatment itself, while controversial and maybe useless for autism, is not really dangerous if administered correctly.


28 posted on 08/24/2005 3:44:05 PM PDT by JmyBryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Born Conservative
People die all the time from traditional medical treatment but it's just accepted that the patient died in spite of doctors doing all they could to treat the patient.

I'm sick of the double standard. I don't know what caused the death of this child. I know of a few people who have done chelation and swear by it.

I know of people who have heart by-passes and their health is not so good afterward and some have even had strokes on the operating table. Others have died, yet we have by-passes being performed all the time.

We need to keep an open mind about this.

One person I know who had chelation has a daughter who is a pharmacist and the daughter was all for her mom doing this and is pleased with the results.

160 posted on 02/26/2006 5:26:57 AM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson