Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 1Old Pro

Actually Old, depending on the kind of trust you set up that's not exactly true.

Plus, the "lookback" provision for putting money into a trust is 5 years, rather than the 3 years they look back for family gifts.

There are many downsides to Living Trusts. One of them is that you hit the highest tax rates much quicker. Also, if you have any control over the Trust at all, then it will be considered an asset, both for Medicaid purposes and for inheritance tax purposes.


14 posted on 08/24/2005 8:10:58 AM PDT by crushkerry (Visit www.anklebitingpundits.com for great original conservative commentary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: crushkerry
My post was tongue in cheek. But to your points, the poster probbly has 5 years before they require nursing care, they can get all income from the trust and a child can "manage" it as trusteee thus keeping realistic control over the assets. As far as tax rates, 50% of the "trust" assets is better than nothing.

There are other ways to preserve wealth and avoid taxation. My point is / was sarcastic that someone would actually consider taking care of themselves.

17 posted on 08/24/2005 8:34:14 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson