To: Vive ut Vivas
Why are scientists so sure of the origins of life when they cannot even "determine" when life begins after a child is conceived?
Certainly there are enough case studies possible that such a determination should be able to be reached.
There are those who say that "when life begins" should be left up to each state. THAT'S bad science.
68 posted on
08/24/2005 8:06:48 AM PDT by
weegee
(The Rovebaiting by DUAC must stop. It is nothing but a partisan witchhunt.)
To: weegee
Why are scientists so sure of the origins of life when they cannot even "determine" when life begins after a child is conceived?
Because the issue of when a child exists following the union of sperm and egg is a philosophical question, not a scientific one. There's no mystery of what happens after the union of sperm and egg cells, either immedately after or in the months following, the issue is when the resulting product should be termed a "child".
210 posted on
08/24/2005 12:14:33 PM PDT by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson