Amusing subterfuge.
If ID postulates a divinity, you claim it is not science. If ID does not postulate divinity, you claim it is not science.
Evolution begins with minimal assumptions as well - is it also not science?
No physics? No chemistry? And you want to pass this off as science?
Evolution, as postulated by darwin, began without the slightest clue as to how traits were transmitted. No mechanism was provided. Yet I would doubt that you would deny evolution as "science" at that time, despite its shortcomings in that regard.
...shakes head in disbelief...
How quaint.