| What a dumb statement. Gee, that's an argument. It's called an introduction, an attention catcher. It seems to have served its purpose. The market is the judge of that, not you. Perhaps this is painfully obvious, but I am a part of the market, therefore my opinion that he is not qualified to do a three-hour show is quite valid. In short, I am a consumer. That's who I am to say whether or not he is qualified. The market is a single entity. You are a part of it like a passenger on a ship. You can choose to be on the ship, or not, but your input as to the course it takes is for all practical purposes, completely irrelevant. Your assertions that you are qualified is unsupportable, the market has overridden you. Just as a wild, wild guess, you've been Hannitized, right? Hannitized? Baiting doesn't work well with me . What else you got? |
Not really. I always answer my hate-mail, as I get quite a kick out of it.
You can choose to be on the ship, or not, but your input as to the course it takes is for all practical purposes, completely irrelevant. It is as relevant as anyone else's. However, as you can see from this thread, there are other people who are on my side.
Hannitized? Baiting doesn't work well with me. What else you got? I'll take that as a yes. A better question is, however, what else have you got? You see, I outlined specifically why I do not think Hannity is all that great. You have neither countered my points or made points of your own--you have just told me that I am unqualified to make that judgement. In short, you argue like a Democrat.