[Allosaurs_r_us]

You sir, are being a complete ass.

 

Huh? I don't agree, that you, a jury, or a court, can enforce your idea of citizen involvement for liability of a criminal, and I'm the ass? What have you been smokin'?

 

You can't argue a point enough to change someone elses mind and have been shot down so you resort to name calling. How old are you 12? If it gets to much for you, I suggest you head over to the DUmpster. There are a whole DUmp truck full of 12 year old mentality playmates you would get along with very well. They do the same thing. When they get proven to be on the loosing side of an argument, they come up with a slew of four letter zingers they think will baffle you with BS. See ya in the funny papers!

 

 

 

 

[Michael.SF.]

Huh? I don't agree, that you, a jury, or a court, can enforce your idea of citizen involvement for liability of a criminal, and I'm the ass?

Yes, you are being the ass, because you have utterly failed to comprehend anything that I have said. You have selectively read portions of my statements and then made derisive slaps at me (which I ignored).

All I have said are the following:

The case deserves to go forward so that evidence can be made and the case heard. That is all that was decided here.

Second: Anybody too drunk to walk, should not be allowed and or helped to fill their car up with gas to drive off and kill somebody.

Only an utter fool would do that and only a bigger fool would defend them.

You sir, seem to fall into the later category. Now why dont you just STFU, you are boring me.