The ruling allows the jury to decide if I read the article correctly.
Doesn't matter. It's still a stupid ruling. In these days with high gas prices & hurrying to get where we're going we don't need another hitch in the gas-getting process.
Yes, exactly. But it should have been thrown out completely.
Had they refused to give him gas, I am sure he could have come up with some kind of suit against them.
Besides, I am a firm beliver in personal responsibility. This idea of blaming some one else is B.S.
The guy must not have insurance to go after so they find the deepest pockets they can.
I feel for the victims, but let's put the responsibility where it should.