Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraq draft says laws must conform to Islam -text
Netscape News ^

Posted on 08/22/2005 11:13:09 AM PDT by Charlesj

Iraq draft says laws must conform to Islam -text

BAGHDAD, Aug 22 (Reuters) - A draft constitution for Iraq to be presented to parliament on Monday will make Islam "a main source" for legislation and ban laws that contradict religious teachings, members of the parliamentary drafting panel said.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.netscape.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq; iraqiconstitution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-305 next last
To: redgolum
Yes, the Mullahs will be dancing in the streets if this passes.
41 posted on 08/22/2005 11:50:18 AM PDT by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Charlesj
Islam is defined as a "a" main source, not "the" main source of state legislation. That leaves enough wriggle room to keep some secular personal status laws, such as those pertaining to women, on the statute books. Its not enough for extremists like Musab al Zarqawi, who view a secular constitution as godless and hold the Koran is the only law Muslims should live under.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
42 posted on 08/22/2005 11:50:52 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billbears
bill - the operative word in this sentence is legislate. In other words, the de facto position is neutrality (you advantageously left out that no law cannot be passed which violates human rights - see Iraq the Model). They can't pass a law making Christianity the state religion. They probably can't pass a law establishing state casinos.

If the "human rights" clause holds, they also can't pass laws that do not allow women to drive, vote, etc .

Somebody's gonna get hurt, with your knee jerking like that...

Let's see what gets released in the next hour or so before declaring all is lost.

43 posted on 08/22/2005 11:51:26 AM PDT by Warren_Piece (Large buttocks are pleasing to me, nor am I able to lie concerning this matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR

"I've come to the conclusion that all of them have lead poisoning of some sort"


Or they need it, if you get my drift.


44 posted on 08/22/2005 11:51:41 AM PDT by trubluolyguy (How does He know what you're gonna do? He had a great view from YOUR cross.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kjam22

My remark was not meant as sarcasm. Who else could have done as good a job. Certainly not Clinton.


45 posted on 08/22/2005 11:52:20 AM PDT by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
Seriously. Why is anyone surprised? """

I'm not. That's one reason why I opposed this invasion -- and sending American troops to die in Iraq -- from the beginning. The country was a 4th rate military power, didn't have WMDs, wasn't being 9-11, and couldn't be "changed" into a democracy. A lot of blood spilled in behalf of utopian fantasies by policy gurus who almost uniformly don't have any kids or kin in the military.

46 posted on 08/22/2005 11:54:27 AM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Charlesj

its too early to tell what this means. if we start seeing women losing rights, and mullahs and clerics holding government positions of power - then we will know its gone badly.


47 posted on 08/22/2005 11:54:33 AM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: balch3

Who else could have done as good of a job?? It just depends on what you call an acceptable outcome. I think there are several freepers here who I would have let make the decisions.


48 posted on 08/22/2005 11:54:37 AM PDT by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: balch3

Hey I defended the war and defended Bush for ever....The Iraqy people have chosen what they want and it ain't us.We did what we could for them...Its time to come home.


49 posted on 08/22/2005 11:55:34 AM PDT by TShaunK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Charlesj

You guys are a bunch of dopes.

What did you expect? ... Did you think the Iraqi constitution was going to be based on the teachings of Jesus Christ. It's an Islamic country. They are a very religious society, and they are not going to start hang pictures of George Washington and the ten commandment on their court houses.


50 posted on 08/22/2005 11:55:53 AM PDT by JeffersonRepublic.com (There is no truth in the news, and no news in the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
A lot of blood spilled in behalf of utopian fantasies by policy gurus who almost uniformly don't have any kids or kin in the military.

Yep... if the army wasn't a volunteer army you'd have a lot of people here questioning this deal too.

51 posted on 08/22/2005 11:55:57 AM PDT by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: coconutt2000
I agree. I am not really that upset about this at this point. Our laws are based on Christian/Jewish laws. That doesn't mean that we are a theocracy. So why should the Iraqi constitution not reflect the basic principles of the primary religion of the region.

As long as they do not impinge upon the belief system of others in the country, and it is very broad language I think it is ok. As with our country, it will be the interpretation that will be vital. Think we'll see huge "supreme court" fights in Iraq in the future?
52 posted on 08/22/2005 11:56:03 AM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Charlesj

Suppose the Germans decided to institute a government basedon Mein Kampf after we won WW2.

Would we let them?

WE should be dictating the conditions and wording of their Constitution.

This is digusting.


53 posted on 08/22/2005 11:56:43 AM PDT by ZULU (Fear the government which fears your guns. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charlesj

Our troops fighting in the name of Islam. Very ironic and sad.


54 posted on 08/22/2005 11:56:47 AM PDT by truthandlife ("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: balch3

"This is Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld..."


LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


55 posted on 08/22/2005 11:57:03 AM PDT by trubluolyguy (How does He know what you're gonna do? He had a great view from YOUR cross.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: JeffersonRepublic.com

The WH told us we were going to plant freedom, a democracy... and one that would help end terrorism. That's what I expect them to do (even though I know it's a pipe dream)


56 posted on 08/22/2005 11:57:22 AM PDT by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
WE should be dictating the conditions and wording of their Constitution.

This is digusting.

That's the bottom line...

57 posted on 08/22/2005 11:58:08 AM PDT by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife

"Our troops fighting in the name of Islam. Very ironic and sad."

Not me or my son!!!



58 posted on 08/22/2005 11:58:25 AM PDT by TShaunK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: TheDon

don't think for a minute that there aren't forces amongst the Shia, the country's majority, that want to have exactly the Iranian model. there are. the key is whether other forces in the country can stop that, and what leverage the US has over there. our leverage is limited. if US public support for the war was 65%, Bush could tell this interim government to take a hike and we could start over. we can't do that.


59 posted on 08/22/2005 11:58:43 AM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: rob777

Misleading headline.


60 posted on 08/22/2005 11:58:59 AM PDT by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-305 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson