Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SupplySider
Agreed. But if the other guy had a gun, too, or was a violent drunk...

The other guy being "drunk" and in possession of a weapon....?

Let's just say that the drunk would not have the advantage...plus...his actions "could" be justification for use of deadly force...and I said "could".... Again..we can play whatif all day.

I do agree that deescalation of all deadly situations is the correct course.

439 posted on 08/21/2005 11:53:47 AM PDT by cbkaty (I may not always post...but I am always here......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies ]


To: cbkaty
The other guy being "drunk" and in possession of a weapon....? Let's just say that the drunk would not have the advantage...plus...his actions "could" be justification for use of deadly force...and I said "could".... Again..we can play whatif all day. I do agree that deescalation of all deadly situations is the correct course.

I was thinking of the drunk the same way you are, and imagining him dead over someone's breakfast not being quiet enough. A little more premptive deescalation in the world, sort of like defensive driving, could save a lot of lives.

445 posted on 08/21/2005 12:04:34 PM PDT by SupplySider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 439 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson