Now this is a tough Airframe....A-10 baby!
Posted on 08/19/2005 2:36:22 PM PDT by sionnsar
I am not familiar with the plane. I am relying on the story:
that half the left wing, containing one fuel tank, was missing.
Reporters get so many things wrong, I wouldn't be too surprised if this were in error. Lessee... (turning to Google)
Cessna 210 wingspan 36' 11''. Missing 5' 7''. Cabin (on a modified plane), about 42''.
Wing length = (36'11'' - 42'')/2 = 200.5''. Missing 67''. It's missing about 28%, or a bit over a quarter.
So you're closer than the reporter, but less dramatic.
So who has the aerospace ping list?
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
"But despite two of the three passengers being top flight engineers on their way to fix a Boeing 767, no one noticed that half the left wing, containing one fuel tank, was missing."
Incredible pics -- thanks!
Nevermind. . Post 30.
;-)
A-10 Warthog! My favorite jet. :-)
Whaaat!? I'd like to see that (though I am regretting posting this article, for all the pings I'm getting).
It looks like the underneath of several of my son's little metal toy planes. The ones I step on... in the dark....and then say "Oh! Darn!"
Post 30.
"One-winged landing
In the summer of 1983, an Israeli F-15 staged a mock dogfight with Skyhawks for training purposes, near Nahal Tzin in the Negev desert. During the exercise, one of the Skyhawks miscalculated and collided forcefully with the F-15's wing root. The F-15's pilot was aware that the wing had been seriously damaged, but decided to try and land in a nearby airbase. It was only after he had landed, when he climbed out of the cockpit and looked backward, that the pilot realized what had happened: the wing had been completely torn off the plane, and he had landed the plane with only one wing attached.
A few months later, the damaged F-15 had been given a new wing, and returned to operational duty in the squadron. The engineers at McDonnell Douglas had a hard time believing the story of the one-winged landing: as far as their planning models were concerned, this was an impossibility. "
http://www.israeli-weapons.com/weapons/aircraft/f-15/F-15.htm
Paleo has aerospace, I have aviation. I usually won't ping if he does.
Nothing really. From what I can see, all the safety wiring is done in a tightening direction, it has the proper chafe tape on it, clamps and routing looks good. No visible chafing anywhere that I can see on this side of the motor. Bleed air lines are not discolored, no visible leaks, and the leads off the igniter box look good.
What is wrong?
Now this is a tough Airframe....A-10 baby!
210s used to be favored dope planes for small work.
well why would you have to have hydraulics to land.. hydraulics is what makes you airborne (cars anyway hehehe)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.