That was Cindy Sheehan's purpose. Her sad, sad story was meant to obfuscate, and that it did.
Look at the times when both stories dropped. There's no such thing as coincidence.
Thanks for the link. I think we here at FR--yes, I'm guilty as well-- have spent way too much time on Cindy Sheehan and her anti-Semitic moonbat pals. We need to dig into this Able Danger thing. It's really important. There are several good blogs that are tracking it closely, including the Captain's Quarters. See the links below for starters:
http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/005251.php
http://floppingaces.blogspot.com/2005/08/gorelick-wall-sandy-berger-update-viii.html
ooohhh this is good: (from Captain's)
Shaffer has predicted that this PhD will come forward publicly in the next few days, just as soon as she gets assurances that she will suffer no retaliation for talking about the program publicly. The other source, the Navy captain who tried to get the Commission to investigate Able Danger in 2004, still wants his name withheld. However, Orin reports that the AP outed him yesterday. His rank and expertise in futuristic naval warfare has been apparently confirmed by the news agency. [CQ will not use his name until/unless he does so publicly himself out of consideration for his current assignment.]
Hear Hear!
Want to a second your recommedation on the captainsquarter blog. Good stuf!
That was Cindy Sheehan's purpose. Her sad, sad story was meant to obfuscate, and that it did.
Look at the times when both stories dropped. There's no such thing as coincidence.