Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: curiosity

Thomas Huxley was not a scientist. His view was just his (incorrect) philosophical opinion.






Thomas Henry Huxley (1825-1895): physiologist, anatomist, anthropologist, agnostic, educator, and Darwin's bulldog. ...

hmm. sounds like a scientist to me.


918 posted on 08/22/2005 7:51:10 AM PDT by CAPTAINSUPERMARVELMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 909 | View Replies ]


To: CAPTAINSUPERMARVELMAN
Sorry, my mistake. He was a scientist. Good catch. Nevertheless, his philosophical views are only his opinion and beyond the scope of science.
925 posted on 08/22/2005 4:58:07 PM PDT by curiosity (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 918 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson