Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Head
Darwin's own theories has also been shown to have flaws

Such as?

In that regard, IMHO, in such matters, flawed does not necessarily mean out of the question...or even wrong.

The problem isn't that ID is "proven wrong". I've never said that it has been. The problem is that the "evidence" pushed for ID is universally flawed or wrong-headed, and, unlike any scientific theory (including evolution), there is no hypothetical way to prove Intelligent Design wrong.
316 posted on 08/18/2005 8:11:20 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio
wrong-headed

That doesn't seem very scientific. :)

Look, we could go on all night and I have no disposition to do so. You asked for some of the science behind ID. I provided it.

Thanks for the reasoned dialog.

321 posted on 08/18/2005 8:15:43 PM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies ]

To: Dimensio
Darwin's own theories has also been shown to have flaws

Such as?

Are you suggesting there are no flaws in Darwin's theories?

434 posted on 08/18/2005 10:43:04 PM PDT by mordo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson