Given than bovine excrement is a copious source of methane, methane is a useful alternative fuel, and gasoline is now over $2.50 a gallon, I hereby nominate creationists as the solution to the nation's energy crisis. Bovine excrement is also a non-depletable resource, since if we ever run out, a creationist can simply make up some other crock of the valuable substance, such as in the above.
It would seem that the Brassica genus demonstrates a postulate of the antimacroevolutionary movement - that living things are created according to their kinds or generes and that these kinds are stable in themselves.
...Which is why they allegedly are capable of "easily interbreeding with one another and producing hybrids." LOL!
Not only do you have an execrable sense of humor, you can never speak to the point. Your breathtaking and wholly unjustifiable arrogance contributes to your inability to conduct a polite conversation.
Define "species" please.
Which is why they allegedly are capable of "easily interbreeding with one another and producing hybrids." LOL!
Various breeds of dogs mate with one another and create wide arrays of remarkably different hybridized phenotypes - yet they are all called dogs and they all interbreed - the same species according to macroevolutionists.
Yet the cabbages, occurring in almost as broad a variety are reducible to only three which can and are bred with one another to produce this variety - yet according to macroevolutionists they are all different species.
It's a bit of a contradiction.
The macroevolutionist postulate is that through naturally-occurring mutations radically different lifeforms can emerge from the same genotype.
Yet the same macroevolutionists like to argue that cauliflower and broccoli - two extremely similar plants - are an observable example of macroevolution.
Doesn't feed the bulldog.