Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Diamond
Diamond said: "For example, the enzymes in viruses that do repeatable reactions, under the same conditions. If the DNA in mammals is very similar, then if they are all infected by the same virus, why wouldn't the virus be expected do the same thing in the different species?"

That is an excellent question.

If one assumes that the process works as you say, then one would expect to find that particular infection events would occur in the target species with a random frequency unrelated to the presumed common ancestry of various species. Humans, for example, just by chance, might be missing an infection marker which exists in other higher primates.

But that is evidently not what is found. The infection markers demonstrate a non-random frequency which suggests the same common ancestry as other evolutionary evidence.

136 posted on 08/17/2005 2:57:15 PM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]


To: William Tell
...then one would expect to find that particular infection events would occur in the target species with a random frequency unrelated to the presumed common ancestry of various species.

No, I'm suggesting the possibility of an enzymatic mechanism for the insertion locations as opposed to nonfunctional products of retroviral infection that have inserted randomly into the host. The whole proof of the common descent explanation lies in the vast improbability of mostly random viral insertions occurring in the same location in two different mammalian species because the DNA chain is too long for coincidence.

Cordially,

182 posted on 08/18/2005 9:30:03 AM PDT by Diamond (Qui liberatio scelestus trucido inculpatus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson