You say that, but since a rabbit fossil hasn't been found, you are only guessing what the response would be.
I know what they do with what they HAVE found. . .they make it fit. Example: The so called 'refutations' of Behe's book. It's all embraced by evols whether it makes sense or not.
As ridiculous as some of these are, they would all fit ID. None would fit evolution, no matter how hard anyone tried to make them.
Easy for you to say, but no evidence thus far would support your theory that evolution theory supporters in the scientific community wouldn't make them fit.
If you understood anything about evolution you would realise that a modern mammal fossil found in the cambrian would make as much sense for evolution as 1 + 1 = 3
Yes of course such a thing hasn't been found. If it had these evolution threads would have disapeared a long time ago.
This is about potential fossils.
Any potential fossil would fit ID. Even the most ludicrous fantastical fossil would fit ID.
Yet many potential fossils, in fact I dare say most potential fossils would present major problems for evolution. The modern mammal in the cambrian senario is a case of a major problem beyond resolution.