Without requoting the whole diatribe, I love how wonderfully "tolerant" and "scientific" so many evolutionary secular fundamentalists are... It's so refreshing to hear the same old personal attacks. Although it's entirely understandable when you try to defend the indefensible...
Evolution is a complete SCIENCE FRAUD! It is a zealous fundamentalist religious belief masking as science. At least I give the Church of Scientology CREDIT for acknowledging that theirs is entirely a religion, at least they are honest about it and do not lie about it and engage in ad hominem personal attacks to distract from the FACT that evolution is an unsupportable SCIENCE FRAUD!
Evolution requires more blind faith to believe that rocks, water, and a few base chemicals (which no one can even prove existed) are the source of all life. And now evolutionists, realizing that their entire hoax is being exposed as a fraud scream "no fair, you can't say that the origins of life have anything to do with evolution..."
Understandably evolutionists recoil at this because when you evaluate the WHOLE PROCESS, including the INPUTS into that process, evolution collapses. The only thing left is complete intellectual dishonesty, zealous secular fundamentalism, and a house of cards built on fantastical fairy tale lies.
Evolution is the opiate for the atheists, and it is a SCIENCE FRAUD! Science is not damaged by evolution being challenged as the FRAUD that it is, science is damaged by NOT challenging evolution as the FRAUD that it is!
THINK man, evolutionary claims require so many leaps of blind faith that those who ACKNOWLEDGE religious beliefs are easier to accept, at least they are honest that theirs is based on faith.
You are claiming that because we don't know the details of how evolution works, therefore evolution isn't science.
That something occured can be worked out independantly from knowing how it happened.
That evolution has occured on Earth is beyond doubt given the evidence. How it occured is only starting to be looked into. But then we are only starting to look into how an embryo changes into an adult. It simply is not a case that we understand nature well and cannot see how evolution is possible. It is a case of not understanding nature well and lots of research still left to be done to uncover the details of evolution.
"Without requoting the whole diatribe..."
Or answering why you lied about what the Harvard scientists said either
Or explaining why you didn't inform everybody that this *article* (not the AP one, but the one that was the basis for this thread) was written by YOU. Not very honest, though not surprising.
"I love how wonderfully "tolerant" and "scientific" so many evolutionary secular fundamentalists are... It's so refreshing to hear the same old personal attacks. Although it's entirely understandable when you try to defend the indefensible..."
And your rambling *article* was a model of restraint and free from personal attack and invective? RIIiiiggghhht!!
Keep trying to convince yourself that :)