Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dimensio
So you don't actually have any real arguments against the theory of evolution, then.

It is just another immaculate conception, a belief that life just evolved from nothing. Like the “Big Bang” it relies upon a singularity, the DNA molecule. They are inadvertently admissions the universe and life are immaculate conceptions and they are dependent on each other. Categorically, they are the same - - mythology...

525 posted on 08/17/2005 7:23:45 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies ]


To: Sir Francis Dashwood
It is just another immaculate conception, a belief that life just evolved from nothing.

No, it is an explanation of life evolving from common ancestry. Common ancestry is not "nothing".

Like the “Big Bang” it relies upon a singularity, the DNA molecule.

I'm not sure where to begin with a statement so stupid.

They are inadvertently admissions the universe and life are immaculate conceptions and they are dependent on each other.

No, they're not. They start at a certain point that they can explain, and explain nothing before that. Anything outside of their range of explanation is not covered by the theory. The theory of evolution does not explain the ultimate origin of the common ancestor, so it can hardly be called "immaculate conception". Only those with no education on the matter actually claim as much.
552 posted on 08/17/2005 9:11:39 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 525 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson