[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Sure it is. In order to determine how change has occurred, if any at all, there has to be an origin. "

Nope, the origin of life has never been a part of the theory of evolution. But thanks for showing your ignorance! :)

"Humans did not evolve from apes; this much is a certainty in human evolutionary study."

Humans and apes share a common ancestor; this much is certain from all the available evidence. Thanks for showing your ignorance! :)

"If evolution is concerned with human origin, it also is interested in life's origin. "

No, only YOU and other creationists have that fetish :)

[Sir Francis Dashwood]

No, only YOU and other creationists have that fetish

You have a poor memory. You know, as I have told you before, I'm an atheist... (It is the result of your obvious connection to zealotry in defending of marijuana.)

_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-

Humans and apes share a common ancestor; this much is certain from all the available evidence.

No it is not. No “missing link,” no evidence. Dr. Leaky never found any. Humans did not evolve from apes, nor is there evidence, as of yet, of common ancestry, none.

_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-

But thanks for showing your ignorance! :)
Thanks for showing your ignorance! :)

You are a Marxist with a poor memory. That is a typical Marxist response, as is your first quip attacking me as a creationist. Standard Marxist tactics.