[FostersExport]

Let’s move away from the daft idea that a basic organism suddenly popped into existence with a spine. That’s a pretty complicated structure to come about in one fell swoop.

Suppose, on the other hand, an organism mutates a light-sensitive organ. Just a basic little thing. That basic ‘eye’ enables to move towards light where there’s more food (you can use your imagination to work out what it might do with it). More food = better chance of survival and the ‘eye’ gets passed on to the population through breeding. Over time this eye gets more complicated.

Now, that’s not so ridiculous is it? Maybe you would grasp the idea of evolution better if you didn’t think basic cells suddenly grew the complicated organs that we, the most powerful life forms on the planet, have today.

[woodb01]

Suppose, on the other hand, an organism mutates a light-sensitive organ. Just a basic little thing. That basic ‘eye’ enables to move towards light where there’s more food (you can use your imagination to work out what it might do with it). More food = better chance of survival and the ‘eye’ gets passed on to the population through breeding. Over time this eye gets more complicated.

---

I don't want to suppose. How can you PROVE that light had anything to do with the development of anything? If a single celled organism has no awareness of light, then how does an "accident" suddenly develop a detailed system for a very SPECIFIC purpose? The eye by ITSELF disproves evolution. The eye can NOT come about by accident. The nervous system, the brain, even the spinal system and even muskuloskeletal motor controls that are tied to coordination with the eye all militate agains the silly notion that ANY of this "evolved"...

All of the underlying assumptions are FALLACIES because they do not evaluate the impetus that created the eye to begin with... Only assumptions based on blind faith. Use science, PROVE IT!