Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rlmorel
Answer #1. Yes, they have a legal right to their pro-gay viewpoints. Even on an economic level, I give them a pass here. If they are not profiting here, then they wouldn't be doing it. But as you know, this is a question of doing the right thing morally.

I don't think they are, so I won't go there, and I suggest no one else should go there either. That's my right to think that, but that's as far as it goes. I won't go so far as to say they should be prohibited from pandering to gays.

Answer #2. No. As long as there are democrats, I will always be a neo-con, homophobic, reactionary, bigot, etc.

Answer #3. The Gay Manual requires it! But seriously, this is the difference between conservatives and liberals. They call us intolerant, yet they allow no tolerance for our viewpoints.

171 posted on 08/15/2005 5:52:00 PM PDT by Responsibility1st (Figure out what you would die for...then live for it. -Anne Rivers Siddons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]


To: Responsibility1st

Well said. My stance as well.


173 posted on 08/15/2005 6:10:21 PM PDT by rlmorel ("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson