Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PMCarey; Chi-townChief
So, you are separating the Mass from the Homily? How do you not know that Chi-townchief wasn't the finger of God in mass today? You don't know. This priest is spreading propoganda.

I have respect for the Mass, and in being in the presence of His Holiness; but not for political liberal-minded priests injecting UNTRUTHS into a sacred Mass.

Don't you? The efficacy of the mass is through the Eucharist. How does a priest prepare a congregation for the Eucharist? By telling them lies?

IMHO, this is not conducive for proper "In Remembrance of Him". Can have a tendency to make the "host" stick in one's throat, going down. IME, of course.

I have witnessed the abuse of propoganda in the church through the ordained clergy, and I've seen exactly how your side of the aisle plays on this matter of "efficacy" ad nauseum. Knock it off.

291 posted on 08/14/2005 4:41:58 PM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies ]


To: Alia
So, you are separating the Mass from the Homily? How do you not know that Chi-townchief wasn't the finger of God in mass today? You don't know. This priest is spreading propoganda.

He might very well be. If you note, I never said that I disagreed with his opinion. Nor did I separate the Mass from the Homily. I stated that the homily is not the center of the Mass and that the focus of the Mass is on the Word and on the Eucharist. Priests, being flawed human creators will say the silliest things at times and other times they will put you to sleep.

I have respect for the Mass, and in being in the presence of His Holiness; but not for political liberal-minded priests injecting UNTRUTHS into a sacred Mass.

While you and I can agree that the priest was spouting political views that we disagree with (though we must be careful to remember that neither of us was actually there), whether or not they were UNTRUTHS (your caps) is a matter in the end left to God. This is different from a priest speaking heretical views, which Catholics can point to being untruths. The Church has not spoken on the affairs of Cathy Sheehan. So a little humbliness is never a bad thing - even when we're sure we're right (or maybe, especially when we're sure we're right.)

Don't you? The efficacy of the mass is through the Eucharist. How does a priest prepare a congregation for the Eucharist? By telling them lies?

Hopefully not, but in the end I prepare myself for the Eucharist. No one can do that for me. So whether or not the priest gives a bang-up sermon or puts me to sleep, it's the same Eucharist.

IMHO, this is not conducive for proper "In Remembrance of Him". Can have a tendency to make the "host" stick in one's throat, going down. IME, of course.

It's not simply "In Remembrance of Him", it is Him. Now you may or may not believe that, but that is what the Church teaches - and that is where I'm coming from on this thread. Now if you believe the Eucharist is simply ceremonial bread, I guess I can understand why you place so much emphasis on the priest's homily.

I have witnessed the abuse of propoganda in the church through the ordained clergy, and I've seen exactly how your side of the aisle plays on this matter of "efficacy" ad nauseum. Knock it off.

Really, I find myself absolutely mystified by your rancor.

303 posted on 08/14/2005 6:05:10 PM PDT by PMCarey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson