The best summary I've read yet about this massive coverup. Anyone doubt what Sandy berger was trying to shove down his pants now?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-109 next last
To: TonyInOhio; Peach; sheik yerbouty; NormsRevenge; Travis McGee; writer33; TAquinas; montag813
I'm sure I havent been the first to say it but....
This is HUGH and SERIES!!!!!!!
2 posted on
08/11/2005 6:00:22 PM PDT by
Stellar Dendrite
(The meaning of "peace" is the absence of opposition to socialism -- Marx)
To: TonyInOhio; rintense; MJY1288; RedBloodedAmerican; twyn1; kitkat; justshe; ladyinred; lonestar; ...
And why is that significant? Because debunking the Atta-Iraq connection was of vital importance to Democrats, who had become focused almost obsessively on the preposterous notion that there was no relation whatever between Al Qaeda and Iraq -- that Al Qaeda and Iraq might even have been enemies. PING
3 posted on
08/11/2005 6:01:18 PM PDT by
Mo1
To: TonyInOhio
Yes, Let's hear all about how Sandy Berger ties into this whole mess and DELIBERATELY STOLE NATIONAL ARCHIVE FILES...He and Jamie Gorelick ought to both be hauled into court and sued by Joe American!
To: TonyInOhio
Anyone doubt what Sandy berger was trying to shove down his pants now?Clinton screwed up BAD!!! I really, really hope the right wing pundits spend a lot of time on this. It explains a lot!
5 posted on
08/11/2005 6:01:28 PM PDT by
concerned about politics
("A people without a heritage are easily persuaded (deceived)" - Karl Marx)
To: TonyInOhio
"And why is that significant? Because debunking the Atta-Iraq connection was of vital importance to Democrats, who had become focused almost obsessively on the preposterous notion that there was no relation whatever between Al Qaeda and Iraq -- that Al Qaeda and Iraq might even have been enemies."
This is explosive! Can we get the media off Natalie and all the other BS?v This is important!
6 posted on
08/11/2005 6:01:53 PM PDT by
defconw
(ALLEN IN 08)
To: TonyInOhio
Got a link to the AP story? I can't find it.
To: TonyInOhio
Why did this hit so big now? We were discussing it here during the commission hearings. Did some MSM have a slow news day?
8 posted on
08/11/2005 6:02:16 PM PDT by
bigsigh
To: TonyInOhio
Send Gorelick to Gitmo!!!!!!
9 posted on
08/11/2005 6:02:20 PM PDT by
Stellar Dendrite
(The meaning of "peace" is the absence of opposition to socialism -- Marx)
To: TonyInOhio
How much coverage is this getting with most of the media, or need I even ask?!
10 posted on
08/11/2005 6:02:21 PM PDT by
BonnieJ
To: TonyInOhio
So was the staff a) protecting the Atta timeline or b) Jamie Gorelick or c) the Clinton administration or d) itself, because it got hold of the information relatively late and the staff was lazy? CAN YOU SAY CHINA GATE??
12 posted on
08/11/2005 6:03:06 PM PDT by
Mo1
To: TonyInOhio
If I had a nickel, hell, even a penny, for those of us who thought of Sandy Berger immediately, I would never have to work the rest of my life.
To: TonyInOhio
15 posted on
08/11/2005 6:03:46 PM PDT by
thoughtomator
(Free Michael Graham!)
To: TonyInOhio
16 posted on
08/11/2005 6:04:11 PM PDT by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... "To remain silent when they should protest makes cowards of men." -- THOMAS JEFFERSON)
To: TonyInOhio
The manner in which the left is trying to play down and write off the AD story tells me there is really something here. Someting very bad for the Clinton administration.
18 posted on
08/11/2005 6:04:57 PM PDT by
Jeff Gordon
(Recall Barbara Boxer)
To: TonyInOhio; Peach
????....THE 9/11 COMMISSION IN MORTAL DANGER ....????
Whoooaaah
????....stay out of Ft. ______ Park?
19 posted on
08/11/2005 6:05:03 PM PDT by
maestro
To: TonyInOhio
20 posted on
08/11/2005 6:05:09 PM PDT by
The South Texan
(The Democrat Party and the leftist (ABCCBSNBCCNN NYLATIMES)media are a criminal enterprise!)
To: TonyInOhio
22 posted on
08/11/2005 6:05:46 PM PDT by
jimbo123
To: TonyInOhio
"Because the Mohammed Atta timeline established by the Commission pointedly insisted Atta did not meet with an Iraqi intelligence agent in Prague."
But that did not happen in 1999. It happened, supposedly, in 2001.
The visit to Prague may have been a misidentification. what makes it interesting now is how the Commission's final report, and leaks before it, tried to demean the identification by using...a timeline. Interestingly, the Prague sighting occured during a records-gap of about a week of Atta's travels inside America. The commission essentially ruled since there was no evidence Atta left in that period, he couldn't have left. Very weak. Now we have another dispute about a timeline.
"Anyone doubt what Sandy berger was trying to shove down his pants now?"
Yes. He could have been stealing any number of documents showing his negligence, in hind sight. He wouldn't have been told about a specific Able Danger sighting, so I doubt his conduct has anything to do with that.
24 posted on
08/11/2005 6:05:56 PM PDT by
Shermy
To: TonyInOhio
Biggest story of the year! Also, what exactly did Sandy Burglar's antics (stolen docs) have to do with this story as well? Hmmmmm?????
To: TonyInOhio
So was the staff a) protecting the Atta timeline or b) Jamie Gorelick or c) the Clinton administration or d) itself, because it got hold of the information relatively late and the staff was lazy? or e) protect Sandy Berger so we don't find out what he was stuffing down his pants or f) all of the above
27 posted on
08/11/2005 6:07:04 PM PDT by
sydbas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-109 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson