Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Just mythoughts; Physicist; Doctor Stochastic; longshadow; PatrickHenry; js1138; b_sharp; ...
No wonder you find comfort in evolution.

Believe it or not, I do not find comfort in evolution. It is just a theory that has evidence to back it up. Actually, I find the theory cold and disheartening. However, as a scientist, I have to accept the evidence presented.

I have to wonder if there is not a similar story behind 80% of evolutionists.

I would doubt it. Much of the scientific community agrees with evolution.

I imagine those calling you names were probably the most outstanding church goers.

This is true. However, in the end I became a born again Christian fundamentalist who accepted a 6000-year-old Earth and Heavens. I took the bible literally. (Did you know I have read it thru a number of times?) However, as I studied the evidence as I continued my education, I began to see discrepancies between what was written and evidence I could measure with my own instruments. Over time, I had to abandon the quaint notion of a 6K-year-old universe and embrace the far more complex vistas of science, cosmology, astronomy, geology, biology, and evolution. (I fought doing that tooth and nail at first. Hey it's hard to shake your very faith to the core. But the evidence and my scientific training forced me to).

This is where I come from.

130 posted on 08/14/2005 9:02:34 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]


To: RadioAstronomer
Bravo. The fight isn't between those who accept evolution as a valid theory and Christians.

The dispute is between those who accept evolution and those who insist on a literal interpretation of the bible as they read it.

One can be an "evolutionist" and a Christian, but many here would disagree.

131 posted on 08/14/2005 9:10:07 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

To: RadioAstronomer

I'm fond of the ancient Greek tradition of attributing divine parentage to kids of dubious lineage. The girl would just say: "A god came to me when I was alone in the woods." Charming.


134 posted on 08/14/2005 9:21:04 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. The List-O-Links is at my homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

To: RadioAstronomer
Thank you so much for sharing your testimony, my friend!

The 6,000 years from Adam to now v the age of the universe is not a problem to me due to relativity and the inflationary model. Six days from the inception space/time coordinates are roughly equal to 15 billion years from our space/time coordinates.

There is no conflict when I consider Genesis 1-3 applies to the creation of both heaven and earth and describes events in both (as in Colossians 1:15-20) - that Adam's calendar doesn't begin until he is exiled to mortality in Genesis 4. The "clue" is that the tree of life is in the center of the Garden of Eden (Gen 2) and in the center of Paradise (Rev 2), i.e. spiritual or heavenly.

Seems like doctrines which insist that Adam was the first mortal man will always have a problem with science unless they assert that God created an old-looking universe, 6000 years ago.

173 posted on 08/14/2005 9:09:03 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson