Let's talk about the principals of the case, then.
The case in question involved a law whereby cable providers were required to limit or control their otherwise legal programming in order to prevent children from being exposed to naked Playboy Playmates.
However, the only way cable gets into a house with children is if the parents or other adults living in such house actually order the cable.
The government was, in essence, trying to expand its power to regulate what legal products a cable company could sell to adults.
I do not see anything non-conservative about opposing such a law.
Bingo, Modernman.