"Just more evidence that there is actually NOTHING that indicates this man will be another Scalia when on the court."
Absurd hyperbole. There is plenty to indicate that he has a strict constructionist philosophy. You're just ignoring it.
Here we go again. I've heard this from Roberts supporters about 12 times. No evidence is ever provided.
But I'll try again. What specific evidence am I "ignoring" that indicates Roberts is going to be another Scalia?
Maybe, Coulter missed it. I sure did.