No, they just allowed Cable companies to spew porn into homes before kids' bedtimes. Your idea of "freedom" is to have us free like ancient Romans, to numb our minds on modern equivalent of gladiator games.
If the Supreme Court were really interested in "rolling back" the state, they'd outlaw the progressive income tax, most eminent domain, all price controls and most federal economic regulations. That's the stuff that curtails our freedom -- But I guess you're ok with being a serf to the state as long as the porn keeps flowing.
Cable is a completely voluntary pay service. Don't think Comcast is doing a good enough job of dealing with signal bleed and whatnot? Don't subscribe. It's a very easy and government-free solution.
Your idea of "freedom" is to have us free like ancient Romans, to numb our minds on modern equivalent of gladiator games.
Again, nobody is making you buy cable.
If the Supreme Court were really interested in "rolling back" the state, they'd outlaw the progressive income tax, most eminent domain, all price controls and most federal economic regulations. That's the stuff that curtails our freedom -- But I guess you're ok with being a serf to the state as long as the porn keeps flowing.
In what way is your little list of complaints in any way relevant to the issue at hand? If you haven't noticed, Roberts is not currently on the Supreme Court, so you can't really blame him for the Court's failures.
I guarantee they are not allowed to spew porn into my home. If they are spewing porn into your home, it is YOUR fault, not the village's.