To: hinterlander
I don't believe Thomas is fully credible on the porn issue.In what way? He's a constitutionist. He would leave it up to localities to deal with porn. And he'd overturn Roe v. Wade on constitutional grounds.
Religious conservatives would win more of their battles if they looked for a strict constructionist instead of a conservative activist.
122 posted on
08/11/2005 1:04:19 PM PDT by
dirtboy
(Drool overflowed my buffer...)
To: dirtboy
In what way?
I, personally, don't believe he's impartial on porn, itself.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson