Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dolphan
I'm gonna get nailed for this but...private property owners should be allowed to restrict/admit whoever they please onto all or any of their property.

Private property owners, yes, but this was a business, a resort doing business with the public. In case you hadn't heard, the public now includes black people. Private property rights are a poor refuge for public racism.

27 posted on 08/11/2005 12:38:43 PM PDT by SlowBoat407 (A living affront to Islam since 1959)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: SlowBoat407

It has nothing to do with racism, as I would have no problem with a black property owner restricting access to whites, or whoever else he (as the owner) wants to restrict.


29 posted on 08/11/2005 12:41:45 PM PDT by Dolphan ("If you get caught in the thunderstorm, please move inside, fast! " - 1360 WKAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: SlowBoat407
Private property owners, yes, but this was a business, a resort doing business with the public.

Was it? The guy who locked up the pool was head of the home owners' association. Tells me that the pool was associated with a private home development. They have rules and are free to restrict how many guests can access the pool, etc.

If the pool belonged to a resort, then there's no way this guy could be 'head of the homeowner's association.'

There's something screwy with this story.

204 posted on 08/12/2005 6:30:13 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson