To: King Prout
Whether or not viruses meet all definitions of "life," they evolve. Their reproduction is typically less passive than that of the hypothesized earliest self-replicators on Earth. For instance, viruses often have some kind of protective husk with little booby-trap mechanisms to inject the nucleic acid payload into a cell upon proper triggering.
What you've stated is the most popular view of the origin of viruses but there is at least one other interesting idea. Cellular life may have arisen as "parasites" upon something called RNA-world, a whole ecosystem acting as one big organism. Viruses might be the remnants of the RNA-world "host," now parasitizing the former cellular parasites.
245 posted on
08/15/2005 6:13:07 AM PDT by
VadeRetro
(Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
To: VadeRetro
entirely possible, and fits in with my suspicion that common descent from ONE common cellular organism might be erroneous.
247 posted on
08/15/2005 4:23:41 PM PDT by
King Prout
(and the Clinton Legacy continues: like Herpes, it is a gift that keeps on giving.)
To: VadeRetro
and, of course, it may be both
some viruses might be remnants of RNA World
other viruses might be escapees from cellular DNA/RNA
248 posted on
08/15/2005 4:24:59 PM PDT by
King Prout
(and the Clinton Legacy continues: like Herpes, it is a gift that keeps on giving.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson