The New GOP Betrays America

Newsmax ^ | Thursday, Aug. 11, 2005 | Diane Alden

[fallujah-nuker]

Article 4, section 4 of the Constitution:

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

Article 2, section 1:

Clause 8: Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:--"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

[judgeandjury]

The anti-Bush anti-GOP hysteria spewed by a tiny minority of posters on FR has reached unprecedented high levels this year.

If they make up such a tiny minority of posters on FR, it shouldn't be too difficult for you to ignore them.

[Stellar Dendrite]

Bump mine! :)

[NormsRevenge]

LOL

got yur talking points out, huh?

Good for you, I'll give ya all those.

In the meantime, Look at the courts and hope like hell we don't get souter'd again.

[Psion]

Absolutely.

[jveritas]

I forgot to mention that despite they are a tiny minority they are very vocal and very annoying and I just like to put them down and expose their delusion and bitterness. I specially enjoy their suffering when President Bush and the Republican party scores one victory after another. I do it to them as I do it to the left wing liberals.

[grey_whiskers]

The anti-illegals crowd is neither Christian, pro life nor evangelical. They are anti-family values, anti-medical care for babies, anti-education of children, anti-Catholic Church, and pro abortion.

Funny, that's not what FR founder Jim Robinson says according to this thread:

As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-Constitution, pro-Bill of Rights, pro-gun, pro-limited government, pro-private property rights, pro-limited taxes, pro-capitalism, pro-national defense, pro-freedom, and-pro America. We oppose all forms of liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism, wacko environmentalism, judicial activism, etc. We also oppose the United Nations or any other world government body that may attempt to impose its will or rule over our sovereign nation and sovereign people. We believe in defending our borders, our constitution and our national sovereignty. (emphasis mine)

After comparing this list to your latest comment, I have come to the conclusion that you are a troll.

Does anyone know whether it is in fact true that bayourod has previously been banned; that is, "banned" and not just "had a post or two deleted"?

If my request is itself out of bounds, then please disregard it...

Cheers!

[judgeandjury]

The anti-illegals crowd is neither Christian, pro life nor evangelical. They are anti-family values, anti-medical care for babies, anti-education of children, anti-Catholic Church, and pro abortion.

More delusional rambling from a despicable anti-American.

[grey_whiskers]

Thanks, I saw it AFTER I posted a request for info on bayourod's banning history.

I gotta stop posting past my bedtime. . .

Cheers!

[Stellar Dendrite]

No, Bayourod *has* been banned recently at least twice that *I* know of. Other posters that have been around longer say it's happened before.

[NormsRevenge]

.. I just like to put "them" down ..

That's the operative part of your comment, I take it. LOL

As you act, so shall you be.

[Psion]

"More delusional rambling from a despicable anti-American."

Absolutely! The Founders of this nation warned of those who put greed before principles.

[bayourod]

You claim to be a Christian.

Would a Christian deny emergency room medical care to a woman in labor simply because she didn't have proper immigration papers?

Would a Christian stand by and let a new born baby die instead of allowing the emergency room to care for the baby?

Would a Christian take the parents away from small children and deport them without even giving them a chance to arraigned for the care of their children?

Would a Christian machine gun down a man trying to cross a border to work to feed his children?

Would a Christian deny public education to a child because his parents don't have proper papers, even though that child is an American citizen?

Would a Christian call for Catholic priests to be imprisoned for providing food and shelter to illegal laborers?

Would a Christian ridicule President Bush for advocating compassion?

Would a Christian support the bombing of Mecca if any terrorist sets a bomb off in America?

[fallujah-nuker]

" Are you opposed to all political involvement by Christians or just support of Republican candidates by Republicans?"

It is OK for Christians to be involved in politics, and support either party as they see fit. But they should do it on their own and not as an organized effort, whoever is elected, it is God's will. Kind of like the military, don't campaign in uniform. Effort spent spreading the message of Christ reaps a bigger dividend.

"Out of curiosity, since you are anti-Republican, which party are you a member of, do you support, prefer, or whose candidate for president you voted for in the last election? Or are you waiting for Buchanan to tell you which third party you believe in?"

I used to be a Republican but now have no party. My first involvement in a campaign was Ronald Reagan's challenge to Gerald Ford in 1976, I was very involved in politics and in 1982 was elected as a Republican PCO, I only served a term because I moved away after I was married.

It seems to me that the crowd that opposed Reagan in 1976 runs the party today, the rhetoric is Reagan but the reality is Rockefeller. My loyalty is to America rather than party, as such I have never voted for a Democrat because I do not believe in the principles they stand for today. I voted straight Republican in 2004 except for President, I did not see Bush or Kerry as fit and gave neither my vote.

IIRC Buchanan endorsed Bush in the 2004 election? I do not feel that our system would encourage a third party, that is for nations with a parliamentary system and Prime Minister. However that does not guarantee that a major party cannot be bumped off, as the Whigs discovered in 1860.

I'm not anti-Republican, I'm pro-American.

[Stellar Dendrite]

"the rhetoric is Reagan but the reality is Rockefeller."

That is the best line I've seen in a LONG time. Great for a tagline!

[fallujah-nuker]

I watch George W. Bush and all I see is Nelson Rockefeller in cowboy boots.

[Euro-American Scum]

Spot on ping!

[bayourod]

Three words: Richard Schultz Schweiker

[eldoradude]

You try so hard...I am a Christian.

Would a Christian support the bombing of Mecca if any terrorist sets a bomb off in America?

Why wait? Nuke the moon God in his lair now! LOL, this has so little to do with the original post.

[eldoradude]

I watch George W. Bush and all I see is Nelson Rockefeller in cowboy boots.

I rather doubt George will check out via assistant humping heart attack. That line describes Clinton more accurately than Bush.