"Friendly to private property rights".....lmao
You have no right to anyone's private property. If I wanted my property listed as an historical site, I'd have filled out the proper paper work to do so.
"Hysterical" is always the term used by those who hope to shut the mouth of the private property owner.
Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's.
Yes we are friendly to private property rights since we don't take any private property. If we want it, we have to buy it just like anyone else. We have no power to condemn private property or use eminent domain proceedings against any private property owner.
Hypothetically if we wanted a piece of property that was for sale and a developer wanted the same property, we would have to pay more or the property owner would have to WANT to sell to us (or a preservation organization).
I called you hysterical because you are hysterical.